US Supreme Court decision allowing LGBTQ+ discrimination faces widespread condemnation

Despite an existing anti-discrimination law, the Supreme Court justices voted 6-3 to allow businesses to refuse service to LGBTQ+ customers.

LGBTQ Pride flag and signs reading Don't Roll Back Our Rights held in front of Supreme Court building.
Image: Twitter @ReallyAmerican1

On Friday, June 30, the US Supreme Court voted 6-3 in favour of allowing certain businesses to refuse to serve LGBTQ+ customers, making it the first time in history that a public business can legally refuse service based on a customer’s sexual orientation.

Despite a state law prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, the justices sided with Colorado web designer Lorie Smith, who claimed she has a First Amendment right to refuse to design wedding websites for same-sex couples because of her Christian beliefs.

Conservative justices supported Smith, with Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, writing for the majority, saying that the First Amendment protected the designer, from being compelled to express views she opposed.

Dissenting justices called the ruling a “license to discriminate” since businesses can now refuse LGBTQ+ clients. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote, “Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.”

While framed as a free speech case, activists are worried the ruling will have dangerous repercussions for LGBTQ+ people and other marginalised groups.

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson released a statement calling Friday’s Supreme Court ruling “a deeply troubling crack in our progress and should be alarming to us all,” adding, “The LGBTQ+ community is in a state of emergency where all levels of government are trying to erase us, but we will not let them erase us—we will fight back.”


US President Joe Biden fears the ruling will invite further discrimination, saying: “In America, no person should face discrimination simply because of who they are or who they love.”

Vice President Kamala Harris tweeted: “The Supreme Court has paved the way for businesses to discriminate against the LGBTQI+ community, racial and religious minorities, the disability community, and women.”

Vocal LGBTQ+ ally Pedro Pascal also called out the justices who supported the case by posting a photo of the Supreme Court justices with Pride and trans flags on his Instagram stories.

The court’s vote represents the latest decision in a series of cases that ruled in favour of conservative Christian groups. In the past year, the US Supreme Court’s 6-3 supermajority has overturned Roe v Wade, ended affirmative action in university admissions and rejected President Joe Biden’s $400 billion plan to cancel federal student loan debts.

While the Supreme Court decision has been widely condemned, The New Republic suggests that the case may have been based on a fabricated request.

According to its research, the name, address, and contact information of the plaintiff in the case were fake. Furthermore, the allegedly gay man who apparently asked Smith to design a wedding website is, in fact, a straight man who is married to a woman, and he denies the claims.

It is possible that the court’s decision will be revisited if it was based on a fake claim.

© 2023 GCN (Gay Community News). All rights reserved.

Support GCN

GCN has been a vital, free-of-charge information service for Ireland’s LGBTQ+ community since 1988.

During this global COVID pandemic, we like many other organisations have been impacted greatly in the way we can do business and produce. This means a temporary pause to our print publication and live events and so now more than ever we need your help to continue providing this community resource digitally.

GCN is a registered charity with a not-for-profit business model and we need your support. If you value having an independent LGBTQ+ media in Ireland, you can help from as little as €1.99 per month. Support Ireland’s free, independent LGBTQ+ media.

0 comments. Please sign in to comment.